On 8/25/07, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In short: they mean different things. As Kevin Marks pointed out, GEO is > for physical location. >
Then we are still left with the issue of a business that has multiple offices. They are different physical locations and not merely different mailing addresses for the same location. One alternative would be to mark them up as separate hcards (using the include pattern for common information) but this feels wrong. Although it doesn't technically violate the DRY principle, it would be violating the spirit of the DRY principle by simply duplicating information for the purpose additional GEO's. Although not relevant to the discussion, I believe I will continue to mark up each physical address with its own GEO and let the parsers extract what they will. Unless, of course, a more appealing solution or convincing argument is proposed. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
