In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

>>Syntactically the URI would still work, however, semantically it would have
>>been broken, that is, it is bad to not only change URIs so that they 404 and
>>just plain don't work, but it is also bad to change the *meaning* of that
>>URI.
>
>On the contrary, the meaning of the URL would remain the same, and be
>more relevant to the content at that URL. For example:
>
>        <http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard>
>
>is "the wiki page about the hCard microformat", with no reference to
>the specification; that would be:
>
>        <http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-specification>
>
>
>>As Brian pointed out, the URLs for hCard, hCalendar, hReview etc. all *mean*
>>the *specification*.
>
>That's an assertion, for which you have provided no evidence; I'm
>calling you on it (see also above).

Points neatly underlined by the existence and use of:

        <http://microformats.org/wiki/XFN>

-- 
Andy Mabbett
            *  Say "NO!" to compulsory UK ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
            *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
            *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to