On 10/9/07 15:42, "Frances Berriman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/09/2007, Michael Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a quick question to ask whether hatom requires an updated?
>>
>> http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom#Schema
>>
>> says it is
>>
>> http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom#Entry_Updated
>>
>> Says it's a should and parsers will fall back to published date
>>
>
> Yeah, that's right. I've found that many people tend to just use
> published though (myself included), and forego ever using updated.
>
> What're you having problems with?
Am also planning to use just published and ignore updated
Just wondered why the wiki is inconsistent?!?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on
it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
