On 10/09/2007, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/10/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As Frances mentions, most people just use "updated", but if your > > underlying CMS knows the difference between the publish date and the > > updated date and you want to expose this information, you'd be best to > > use both. > > Whoops, Frances said "published". The main thing is _one_ of them is
Aye - it's that slip of the tongue which seems all too common when discussing posting dates that causes the confusion, in my opinion. Published and updated tend to be rather interchangeable terms for authors. As for the inconsistency - I'm not sure to be honest. I assume it's an over-sight on the contributors part. If no one has any clear reason why it should say one thing in one place, and another somewhere else, then I'd advise it to be clarified to match our conversation here. -- Frances Berriman http://fberriman.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
