On 23/11/2007, Tatsuya Noyori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to suggest that microformats use namespace like the > following example. > > <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > xmlns:mf="http://microformats.org/2007";> > <span mf:term="tel" mf:scheme="http://microformats.org/2007/hcard.rng";> > <span mf:term="type">home</span> > <span mf:term="value">+1.415.555.1212</span> > </span> > </span> > > This example is just using @mf:scheme and @mf:term instead of > @xhtml:class or @xhtml:rel. > > Therefore, this example is human readable and machine readable. And, by using > namespace and a link to schema(@mf:scheme), This example is able to be > valid by using validator and > schema(http://microformats.org/2007/hcard.rnc). > > I think microformats need namespace to ensure interoperability. > > How do you think about the suggestion?
You might like to take a look at http://microformats.org/wiki/namespaces for some of the reasons why we discourage their usage. -- Frances Berriman http://fberriman.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
