Hello, I would like to suggest that microformats use namespace like the following example.
<span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:mf="http://microformats.org/2007";> <span mf:term="tel" mf:scheme="http://microformats.org/2007/hcard.rng";> <span mf:term="type">home</span> <span mf:term="value">+1.415.555.1212</span> </span> </span> This example is just using @mf:scheme and @mf:term instead of @xhtml:class or @xhtml:rel. Therefore, this example is human readable and machine readable. And, by using namespace and a link to schema(@mf:scheme), This example is able to be valid by using validator and schema(http://microformats.org/2007/hcard.rnc). I think microformats need namespace to ensure interoperability. How do you think about the suggestion? -- Tatsuya Noyori (^o^)/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
