On Dec 14, 2007 6:45 PM, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a reasonable argument. It's not reasonable, though, to argue > (which you're not, at least not here, but which others seem to be) that > 16:03 is an abbreviation of what a human (geeks aside) would gather from > the context as being "20070912T16:03:00+01:00" (or whatever).
Well, I think a human would know from context that it was an abbreviation for 16:03 on 9th Dec 2007, and would know what time zone we were talking about, which is all the info in that ISO date. I do agree that ISO dates are often completely unreadable and we should continue to explore alternatives, I've not seen on that makes more sense than [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet as I am somewhat against the idea of hiding it in title attributes on arbitrary elements. -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
