In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ciaran
McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Dec 14, 2007 6:45 PM, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. It's not reasonable, though, to argue
(which you're not, at least not here, but which others seem to be) that
16:03 is an abbreviation of what a human (geeks aside) would gather from
the context as being "20070912T16:03:00+01:00" (or whatever).
Well, I think a human would know from context that it was an
abbreviation for 16:03 on 9th Dec 2007, and would know what time zone
we were talking about,
That's the point which I was describing as "a reasonable argument".
which is all the info in that ISO date.
It may be in the ISO date, but the ISO date is not how an ordinary
person would conceptualise that information.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
