Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manu Sporny > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >>> It would be useful to have a >>> more blanket term for instances where one person has multiple roles of >>> that kind. >> >> You can always specify multiple 'role's in hCard to state that the >> person had more than one role. > > One cannot "always" specify such things, because the page content (e.g. > "Beethoven's Fifth") does not always spell out such terms.
Right, point taken. >>> I know you had a problem with it but if the role 'artist' is >>> vague in so far as 'performer', 'composer' etc.. are concerned then >>> perhaps it would be useful for exactly that reason. What do you think? >> >> I've got no problem adding more "contributor types" as convenience >> classes for "composer", "performer", "publisher", "label", etc. >> However, like all things Microformats - they've got to be backed up by >> examples. >> >> The issue isn't "wouldn't these be really cool to have", but rather >> "we need to demonstrate that there are enough of these on the web to >> justify adding more terms to hAudio". > > Like I said a day or two ago: "for the guidance of wise men and..." Alright, wise-guy =P - put the terms that you would like included on the haudio-issues wiki and let's start tracking them. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
