Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Guillaume Lebleu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
not least because the alternative:
<foo class="fn">Pink Floyd</foo>
would be "optimised" (sic) to have a given name of "Pink" and a family
name of "Floyd".
I don't disagree that groups/bands should be considered organisations.
That said, I don't think the reason offered here is a strong one.
Neither do I; that's why I said "not least".
Sorry if I misinterpreted: I'm not a native english speaker.
Doesn't "not least because [reason]" means that [reason] is not the
least reason, i.e. a strong one?
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
