Charles Belov wrote: > Remember that any page these occur on would presumably have a language > specification such as "en-us" so computers would be able to deal with > standard month and day of week names and abbreviations.
I'm sorry, but this sounds like a really bad idea. Parsers would need to maintain translation tables for day and month names, plus abbreviations for them, plus some sort of heuristic for figuring out the language of the page. (In practice, many authors leave out lang/xml:lang attributes, and Content-Language headers.) Andy Mabbett's proposed "data:" prefix already solves the abbr design pattern accessibility issue and can be implemented in just a few lines of code. All we need to do is build support for it into parsers. (Cognition has supported it since alpha2.1.) Closest thing to a "specification" for the prefix: http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2008-February/011583.html -- Toby Inkster <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
