Hello, Ben Ward schrieb: > Correct. The pattern is part-written for this exact user case (As a > Brit, I've been loathe to the ‘cell’ / ‘mobile’ issue since I first got > into microformats.)
I've had similar issues here for german telefax ... > The value-class-pattern is valid for `type` in `tel`, and also in `adr` > and `email`. FWIW, whilst we inherited these structures from vcard, I'm > confident we will never create anything like it again. The community is > more internationalisation aware now. Good to here this. > A remaining to-do task for the pattern development is to update examples > in the specs and related documents (datetimes and enumerations alike). I will have a look at it. So if you need a hand ... > Feedback much appreciated on the pattern (but please see the short > http://microformats.org/wiki/value-class-pattern#FAQ as well.) > > Ben Regards, Mirko _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
