Brian Suda wrote: > On 6/7/07, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> should we should re-use "summary" from hReview ? >> http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Schema >> >> "summary:: This optional field serves as a title for the review itself." >> >> It helps not to confuse the title of a hAudio with a contained vCard and >> I think it has better meaning > > --- i had the same thought myself. I think we should consider this > swap so it is also more inline with hReview and avoid confusion of FN > in the contributor and well as the FN of the container.
Any objections to changing 'fn' to 'summary'? I definitely like 'summary' much more than 'fn'. Ideally, we would be using 'title' - why can't we do that, again? Because hcard uses it? When the proposal started out, as Martin pointed out in an earlier discussion, we started with 'work-title'. What are the arguments against using 'title'? The only one that I can think of is "hcard already uses it". The use of 'title' with haudio seems to be a much more correct use of the word "title" that could be used in hAudio, hVideo, hPublication, hMedia, etc. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
