Brian Suda wrote:
> Also, the current spec says that this MUST use an <img>, i would say
> this should be changed to SHOULD, not MUST. There could be cases were
> you might want to simply give the URL to the image or use an AREA or
> OBJECT element. Or possibly use other elements in RSS. We should avoid
> mandating how/where to encoding specific microformat properties.

Sure - I wouldn't be opposed to changing the language from MUST to
SHOULD. Is there any opposition to this change? Speak up now, please...
AGREE/+1 for the change, or DISAGREE with a logical argument.

-- manu
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

Reply via email to