On 8/8/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So far, there are 3 votes for PHOTO (Brian, myself, and I'm counting you > Scott, as you didn't seem opposed to the idea of PHOTO), 1 opposed. It > would help if others would weight in on this so we can put the issue to > rest.
--- firstly, the original message was sent 2 days ago. The fact that others have not given their opinion on this topic probably has to do with a few factors. 1) 2 days from the original message till now is not enough time for readers to weed through the volume of emails and do the background reading needed. 2) people don't have an opinion 3) people simply don't care and an audio media format is not a interest to them. This could be why there are so many OTHER formats that haven't been worked in months. Someone brought-up the idea. It was floated around, never gained traction and it was filed away until it could be used later. At this time, the discussion on this topic has been conducted by a small sub-set of the community. This is certainly not the best way to gather input or opinions - we have 100% support to use PHOTO, based on 2 people´s yes's and and an assumed yes. Does anyone else think that is anemic at best? (i doubt i'll even get much or a response) maybe it is time to take a breath and let people digest some of the issues, ideas, uses, mark-up and all the background reading for awhile. Otherwise it will be the same 3-4 people talking to each other about other issues and we won't really go anywhere. -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
