On 8/8/07 8:14 AM, "Manu Sporny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Suda wrote: >> If you look at the wiki page which lists our classes, >> http://microformats.org/wiki/classes >> you will see that we have several ways of specifying a date >> hCard uses REV, which is the REVISION date >> hCalendar uses LAST-MODIFIED, the time the calendar was last changes >> hAtom uses UPDATED and PUBLISHED >> >> I agree it should use the ISO date-time pattern every other date >> format is using. > > So, we've got 3 votes for PUBLISHED using date-time pattern, none > opposed. I'd like some others to weigh in before we resolve this. A > simple AGREE/+1 would suffice, or DISAGREE with logical argument. In either case, could folks please indicate their agreement or not on the wiki page for the proposal with +/-1, their name, and any additional commentary/explanation for the vote? Let's keep track of content/state on the wiki, not in email please. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
