Tantek Çelik wrote: >>> I agree it should use the ISO date-time pattern every other date >>> format is using. >> So, we've got 3 votes for PUBLISHED using date-time pattern, none >> opposed. I'd like some others to weigh in before we resolve this. A >> simple AGREE/+1 would suffice, or DISAGREE with logical argument. > > In either case, could folks please indicate their agreement or not on the > wiki page for the proposal with +/-1, their name, and any additional > commentary/explanation for the vote? > > Let's keep track of content/state on the wiki, not in email please.
A "Votes" section has been placed on the hAudio-issues page, please note your vote if you have an opinion on any the issues. There are currently 6 issues that need to be voted on for hAudio. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
