On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 21:31 +0100, Julian Stahnke wrote: > > Anyway there is only Me at the moment supporting using *item* > > instead of > > a new microformat *track* > > Nope, I too think item would be better. Maybe, if it is too > meaningless, together with haudio à la <span class="item haudio">. I > don’t know enough about item to say if just item is enough, but I > think it even may be. Then again, if we could use item in such a way > that we could say ‘if it is haudio, look for properties in child > nodes, otherwise use the content of item’, that’d be potentially nice > as well.
Thank you Julian i will take that as another vote FOR using *item* instead of a new proposed microformat *track* I think track is a too powerful a class name to be immediately used in hAudio at the first opportunity we get Track has a vast amount of meaning outside of hAudio, not many of which mean the same thing. http://www.answers.com/track&r=67 If we define track now in hAudio we will be stuck with it then potentially we will have the same problems as we do with the title property in hCard Thanks Martin _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
