Also, regarding "track" vs. "item."
"Track" is familiar and common. I believe I'd even recommended its use at one time. However, it's nothing more than a distortion of meaning through popular usage -- "tracks" in a vinyl record (similar to the use of "patch" for electronic musical instrumentation stemming from the days of patch cables). The CD industry picked up this term as well as it replies to physical sectors on the disc itself. However, there is no "track" in data and we should eliminate an unnecessary literal abstraction (one that will eventually require explanation) by calling it as such. So, as unfamiliar as it is to my ears, I recommend "item" for this role.
Thanks, Justin _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
