On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 17:03 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > Justin Maxwell wrote: > > and i thought i was helping define a microformat, not practicing my > > skill in public debate. so, we're even. :) > > You must be new here. This is the New Microformats Community. We don't > actually create Microformats, instead we endlessly debate the meaning of > words and their implied semantics. Sometimes we argue with one another > just for the hell of it. We are at our best on the weekends, when sane > people are outside, enjoying their time off from work. :)
+1 to Manu > > >> If people refer to a songs or other recording as a "track" - as the > >> evidence [1] shows they do - then we should use that. > > Andy, Martin, Justin, and everyone else that is asserting that TRACK has > multiple, different meanings: You are all correct. > > TRACK has multiple definitions, nobody is arguing that it doesn't. > ITEM is also not as semantically accurate as TRACK in hAudio. > > This thread has been identified as hAudio ISSUE #13 and has been > recorded on the wiki. Please go and leave your feedback/preference for > TRACK or ITEM if you have been involved in this conversation: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Problem:_Container_property_naming > > -- manu > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
