Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Mon, October 15, 2007 16:15, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> Most of the examples that were gathered for hAudio were from music >> service websites and music blogs. To help us make progress, this round of >> haudio focuses on just albums and tracks. > > Is that sufficient?
For albums and tracks, yes. For marking up classical music, no. > How many of them were for classical music, including opera? None. Not one of the submitted 145 example URLs contained any opera or classical music that I can recall. Draw whatever conclusions you want to from that statement. :) If it bothers you, please collect some examples and add them to the audio-info-examples page. Although I fear it would be a waste of your time since we already have several proposals on the table that would solve the infinite nesting issue, which I assume, is what you are talking about. >> However, that is beyond the scope of the current discussion, which is >> just albums and the contents of those albums (tracks). > > Who gets to decide the scope of this or any other such discussion? I was strongly requesting a scope of discussion because the thread was going all over the place. It's over 125 messages deep at this point - which is a good sign that people are talking about too many issues. Also keep in mind that bringing in a great number of issues complicates things and slows the Microformat down. Case in point: The media-info discussion. I should also add that while a reminder to the scope of this discussion was given, the questions that were asked were answered. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
