On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 15:53 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote: > On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Martin McEvoy wrote: > > > > I ticked both boxes in the GUI Baba and Flumps and outputted the > > data in > > the terminal > > > > Baba : 100.00% > > Flumps : 100.00% > > > > I looked at your page thinking "Huh" how can that be correct? > > It's not correct, but that's because you gave it incorrect > information by clicking boxes for properties that weren't really > there. The tool itself isn't determining what properties are there > or not there at all; it only makes it easier for a person to do > that. As Manu was the person who analyzed most of the hAudio sites, > your suggestion that the data isn't trustworthy is essentially a > suggestion that Manu isn't trustworthy.
What is up with this List? How on earth do you come to that conclusion?... > > Obviously no one is perfect, so if you still think the analysis is > wrong, please try to point out specifically where you see errors so > we can correct them. So far I get the impression you're just using a > different meaning of the word "track" than Manu. As long as > everything Manu called "track" is relatively the same type of > information, the specific name isn't particularly important at the > schema analysis stage. Thank you Scott for a nice short answer sometimes you do make sense :) you load properties that you would like to find in a webpage add a few urls the page opens in a browser and YOU the user verifies that the data exists by ticking a box.. correct? Microformalize does not examine the page for its contents the User Does. .... Thanks Martin > > -- > Scott Reynen > MakeDataMakeSense.com > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
