On 10/28/07, Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > > > Scott, I think you and I had the most adverse reactions to this > > approach. I've learned to live with it as this approach did not cause > > problems when marking up over 20 of the audio-info examples. > > > > Thoughts, suggestions, comments? > > > As long as an ITEM within an HAUDIO is itself defined as an audio > recording, I see no problem with leaving out the HAUDIO class name here.
Concurred. There may be an issue in the _docs_ for hListing [1] and hReview [2], i.e. that item can now refer to part of a thing rather than the thing itself, though nothing functional should need to change. There's definitely a change need here [3], though once again no big deal. The way they same to spec item seems to be loose enough anyway, and perhaps after this proposal goes through we can make hItem a real spec and reference that. Regards, etc... [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/hlisting [2] http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview [3] http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-classes -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
