Scott Reynen wrote: > On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> Scott, I think you and I had the most adverse reactions to this >> approach. I've learned to live with it as this approach did not cause >> problems when marking up over 20 of the audio-info examples. >> >> Thoughts, suggestions, comments? > > > As long as an ITEM within an HAUDIO is itself defined as an audio > recording, I see no problem with leaving out the HAUDIO class name here.
Yes, that is the approach that this proposal takes. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
