Martin McEvoy wrote: > This is in Response to Manu's suggestion that maybe we should talk about > changing hAudio "FN" to "Title" > > <snip> > I've never been happy with the choice of FN instead of TITLE in hAudio > (TITLE means "job title" in Microformats). This could offer a good > compromise if people are interested? > </snip> > http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2008-January/011446.html > > Manu I for Once Agree with you ;) and I'm not too happy with it either. > Feedback I have had about haudio seem to all have the same answer audio > has a title too lets call it that. > > I am unsure If we should re-use "title" directly from hcard "Job title" > and "audio title" are both functions I guess? maybe someone can have > more input on this.
The thought about porting the Dublin Core names over to Microformats was mentioned on the uf-discuss list. Having a Dublin Core Microformat, may be a solution that works for everybody. I'd be a very strong supporter of Dublin Core's use in Microformats, especially hAudio. Note that hAudio RDFa already re-uses the Dublin Core metadata vocabulary: http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/HAudio_RDFa The main disagreement seemed to be in DC's choice of class names (DC.title, DC.contributor, DC.date). What about this for a Dublin Core Microformat: dc-title dc-date dc-description ... and on. This approach has two benefits: * It uses Microformat-like names. * It re-uses a vocabulary that is largely accepted in the web semantics community. -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Intro to the Semantic Web in 6 minutes (video) http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2007/12/26/semantic-web-intro _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
