On Mon, February 4, 2008 11:59, Brian Suda wrote:
> the process also states: "There must be a problem to be solved (i.e. a > real world use case). No problem, no microformat." The problem has already been stated. > Jumping straight to making a generic OBJECT DC > format is not the best approach. It is the best - the only - approach for solving the stated problem. > Foaf maps properties in it's namespace to Dublin Core. > Microformat can easily do the same thing, there is no prohibition > against this, as long as the meaning is the same. Just because it is > called > "fn" or "creator" or something else, doesn t mean it can't > become Dublin Core properties. > If the issue can not be solved with existing microformats, then there > are a few options. [...] > 4) use something else, like RDFa, eRDF, GRDDL or others. ...or DC. That's what we're discussing. Given the negative, almost hostile, response to the idea here, I wonder if it might be better discussed in a DC forum? -- Andy Mabbett ** via webmail ** _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
