Thank you David, that's very interesting. It would fill a pretty important gap in describing basic phenomena - time, place, and agents have their uF but not things, in the general sense. Even the simplest container, DC questions aside, would be a very useful step.
Cheers, Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Janes Sent: 04 February 2008 17:30 To: For discussion of new microformats. Subject: Re: RE: [uf-new] Dublin Core (was: hAudio FN or Title) There's been information collected about how an "item" microformat would work, though by no means consider this official, blessed, voted upon, or even official proposed. If anyone is really serious about going down this road, I suggest going back though the mailing list archives, especially around the time hAudio was getting to 0.1. For the record, my idea (now) of hItem would work is: - as the _intersection_ of item attributes, roughly ;-) - as a building block for use in other uFs, following the process I'm still lurking at hAudio discussions to see how this is all working out. _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
