Martin McEvoy wrote:
I have proposed a schema for a "comment" which re-uses Atom/hAtom
terms
there is also some example markup for all to view
I don't see why you feel the need to create a new schema "which re-
uses hAtom terms". What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is
(possibly with the addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal)?
There is no need to re-invent the wheel each time for feeds of
comments, feeds of opinions, feeds of jokes, feeds of poems, feeds of
witty Groucho Marx quotations, etc. Start within hAtom as a base and
refine it for your needs, adding additional terms only if strictly
needed, but not removing anything. That way, the majority of your
format will be parsable with standard hAtom tools without everyone
needing to write new hGrouchoMarxQuote parsers.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
