Martin McEvoy wrote:
Toby A Inkster wrote:
> What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is (possibly with the
> addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal)?
because a "comment" does not fit into the concept of a hEntry,
comments
lack the entry-title element, in fact a "title" it is almost
non-existent in a comment.
hAtom is still a draft format. This use case might be a convincing
argument for hAtom 0.2 to drop the requirement for entry-title, and
make it an optional property.
The majority of the proposed comment schema[1] will work with standard
hAtom tools
[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
The example given there doesn't have a root class name of "hentry",
so would not be picked up by existing hAtom parsers.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
