Scott: Thanks for the reply. I have done the research on the microformats.org site and know that my proposed format does not exist (including using existing formats to accomplish my end result). Of course, the members of this list could always say "I don't think we need a format for that." Would it be helpful to post a link to my blog posts regarding my "proposed pre-draft specification" (meant to jumpstart brainstorming and discussion with the understanding that it may very well change according to community consensus) and an example of its use? Or is that jumping the gun?
Regards, Craig E. Shea On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Scott Reynen <sc...@makedatamakesense.com> wrote: > On Jul 17, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Craig Shea wrote: > >> I have read the process page (and its associated pages) but, I'm still >> confused. Do I start a proposal by mailing to this list, creating the >> suggested wiki pages, or both? > > It's pretty flexible, but generally the first step is to send a proposal to > this list. Someone may have already started working on a similar project, so > mailing the list is a good way to consolidate efforts early. > > -- > Scott Reynen > MakeDataMakeSense.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > microformats-new@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new > _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
