On 18 July 2010 17:47, Craig Shea <craig.e.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Scott: > > Thanks for the reply. I have done the research on the microformats.org > site and know that my proposed format does not exist (including using > existing formats to accomplish my end result). Of course, the members > of this list could always say "I don't think we need a format for > that." Would it be helpful to post a link to my blog posts regarding > my "proposed pre-draft specification" (meant to jumpstart > brainstorming and discussion with the understanding that it may very > well change according to community consensus) and an example of its > use? Or is that jumping the gun?
A pre-draft spec does sound a little like jumping the gun, but since you have it - send it over to the list as a new thread. What would be best to be done along side that would be to build a research wiki page looking at examples of what you want to mark-up in the wild. So yes - that would be helpful :) Frances _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
