Thanks eric,
 Yes you are confirming my thinking. I knew about the waterturbine site and 
they look like best
bet so far. Those Nautilus look really good.
 I can probably build the required structure you suggest. Working on top is WAY 
easier than down
the hole!
 On channelling I had a couple of ideas. One is to recess a slanted panel 
through which I could 
install one or more of those  LH1000 tube style generators. THe slant would 
focus low flow through
the lowest of the set and if I had more than one and flow was high, the slanted 
pan would fill and
divert excess flow to second one. I'd put a final overflow for excess at 
highest end.

--- Eric Youngren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Steinaman,
> 
> Interesting site.   Thanks for posting the pictures.   I don't have any 
> direct experience with this type of low-head, high-flow microhydro, but I 
> have a few thoughts...
> 
> First, you might as well forget about a pelton turbine, you don't have the 
> head for it and even if you had a bit more, the runner would need to be huge 
> to handle the flow you have.    What you need is a reaction turbine, like a 
> Kaplan or propeller type.   Check out www.waterturbine.com   for some 
> "micro" scale commercially available reaction turbines.
> 
> Could you build a small building on top of the "weir tower" to house the 
> turbine and generator, with a draft tube extending down 10'?     You'd have 
> to build up the weir on 3 sides (or knock out one side a bit) to channel all 
> the flow into the intake.  I'm not sure how you'd design the intake and 
> screening arrangement , but perhaps Bob at Hydroscreen could help.: 
> www.hydroscreen.com
> 
> The water diversion idea you mention might turn out to be an easier way to 
> go if you can channel the flow into a penstock that drops steeply over the 
> edge of the bank or dam.    I think the reaction turbine could be mounted 
> either above or below the drop.
> 
> Good luck, and keep us posted!
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "steinaman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:08 AM
> Subject: [microhydro] Site evaluation - advice wanted
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Site evaluation - help wanted
> > (a folder by that name has been created for reference)
> > Given this site, whats easist design to install and maintain?
> >
> > An Engineering problem:
> > (I had posted this previously but got minimal response.
> > I hope I simplified the description enough for more feedback.)
> > I have a good site, but not enough knowledge/experience to use it.
> > My concerns are less to do with the electronics than with the site
> > 'engineering'.
> > How best to select the proper turbine, place it and channel flow to
> > it.
> > How to do it in a low impact, low cost and best ROI way with long life
> > and low maintenance.
> > Once that's more clear to me I can focus on the wiring issues.
> > This would serve a rural/suburban home about 100 yards away which
> > currently uses about 1000 KWH per month. Would prefer to 'offset or
> > feed the grid' at first and consider batteries at a later date.
> >
> > DESCRIPTION: (in Northern Ct., USA)
> > A one acre manmade (1960s) pond, 17 ft at deepest, fed by two
> > streams,
> > which outlets through a vertical concrete wier on the dam side.
> > The dam is earthen, the wier is built like a fireplace/chimney
> > structure standing about 14 feet into  pond from the dam base,
> > which is about 12' deep water at that point. (pics in folder)
> > Water flows in at the top  through trash rack and exits from the base
> > thorugh  a  24" concrete pipe running out of the  dam base.
> >
> > The 30"x24" trash grate at the top has a perimieter of 108".
> > All flow goes through that , nearly year round.
> > Flow over this varies from zero(some, not all Augusts)  to 3" most
> > winters.
> > I have used wier calculations and the  108" pereimeter to find the
> > flow varies from 0 to 1700 GPM.
> > Lets say it averages 600 over a year.
> > There is a 10'  drop inside the concrete structure.
> > This is the maximum head I can achieve on my property.
> >
> > Here are my primary questions:
> > - is my math right? I am not sure the standard 'wier' calculations I
> > see, all illustrated as a board in a stream, apply here.
> >  I.e. do I calculate flow potential correctly?
> >  (see folder's  excel file 'Hydrocalc.xls')
> >  In that file I calculate between 600 to 3200 watts/sec (gross)
> >  at low (300 GPM) to maximum(1700 GPM) flows.
> >
> >  - which turbine type  and placement gains most from this setup?
> >    Optimum solutions avoid draining the pond for installation,
> >         but  that's not out of the question.
> >    -do I construct a flow diversion to concentrate woter flow over
> >        a pelton turbine installed in bottom of wier to gain the most
> >        available head, or
> >    -do I mount a flow through turbine at top, or
> >    -do I adapt the outlet pipe to take power from the concentrated
> >     flow there.
> >    -do I drill a pipe through base of wier to feed nozzle(s) against
> >      a pelton wheel installed down there  with the force applied by
> >      1 acre of pond surface 10 ' above.
> >    -do  I increase pressure and gained energy output by channeling
> >       the 108" of flow through  a pipe or sluice to the turbine?
> >      or does channeling only help me attain the maximum potential of
> >       the calculations?
> >
> >   Besides obvious differences in installation logistics are there
> > major tradeoffs in achieved output?
> >
> >   I think those are the most important issues for me to begin with.
> >   thanks to all  in advance.
> >   Feel free to send directed reply ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you dont wish
> >    to do  broadcast posting.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Does your company feature in the microhydro business directory at 
> > http://microhydropower.net/directory ? If not, please register free of 
> > charge and be exposed to the microhydro community world wide!
> >
> > NOTE: The advertisements in this email are added by Yahoogroups who 
> > provides us with free email group services. The microhydro-group does not 
> > endorse products or support the advertisements in any way.
> >
> > More information on micro hydropower at http://microhydropower.net
> >
> > To unsubscribe: send empty message to 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 860-693-1673 (Home office)
     
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/FGYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Does your company feature in the microhydro business directory at 
http://microhydropower.net/directory ? If not, please register free of charge 
and be exposed to the microhydro community world wide!

NOTE: The advertisements in this email are added by Yahoogroups who provides us 
with free email group services. The microhydro-group does not endorse products 
or support the advertisements in any way. 

More information on micro hydropower at http://microhydropower.net

To unsubscribe: send empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microhydro/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to