> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dion Vansevenant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 July 2000 16:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [midgard] midgard-php: scanner/parser
...
> I think <?[..]?>, and <?(..)?> might cause some problems for some people.
> The two different brackets look a little too close in some cases.
>
> How about <?:...:?> for the second set of tags instead of
> <?(...)?> ? It's a
> nice little sequence, at least on a US keyboard, seems to stand
> out ok. Just
> a thought.
I like this; how about making it valid xml markup tho'? Or at least a more
full xml compatable alternative - just as <?php is xml compliant but <? is
the short version many peopel use.
I think <?mg:#####?/> and <?mg:#####?> are good full alternatives where
##### is the junk that does the real stuff.
This is important if we (and I do) want to be able to use the DHTML editor
or the MSHTML editor to edit articles and fragments such.
Sam
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
