Paul Newby wrote:
>
> > Sure, there's always room for improvement, but there's
> > loads of potential here. Good work, man.
> >
> > I think I heard an earlier comment for SGML presentation
> > format, and I'd love that a lot.
>
> Thanks for your positive comments. Adopting SGML seems
> like a high-priority task. I'm not quite sure how to approach
> this... any guidance from SGML-literate members of the
> list would be appreciated.
I wouldn't go about claiming to be SGML-literate, but the main
issue would be to keep the entries SGML safe, or make them to be
so. The rest would probably only mean framing in SGML tags. I've
lost my reference to the online docbook book, which is great
reading if you're going to go this route. Someone on the list
will have it though.
Emile
