On Nov 30, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: [snip]
>>> 3) The centralized relay architecture is a widely >>> used way at present for IPv4 and it will also be used for IPv6. > > That's the wrong way to say it IMHO. There are sound reasons why > operators want a centralised host management system with distributed > relays. The fact that the solution for IPv4 is called DHCP doesn't > imply that the best solution for IPv6 is called DHCPv6. However, until > there is a well-defined central management system for prefix delegation > and routing options via RA, it seems that DHCPv6 *is* the only available Like AAA? That is used and will be used a lot for address & prefix management, and can also be used for distributing per subscriber route information. > solution. And then we loop back to point 1): it's better to have a generic > option than a bunch of competing vendor options. I would not say competing vendor but competing SDO options. - Jouni > Brian > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
