On Dec 1, 2011, at 4:57 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not saying that the RA architecture can't be enhanced to support > this - for example by describing a stateful RA server - but that > really would end up looking awfully like a DHCPv6 server in all but > protocol details.
One small advantage to this would be that the change would only be required on the router, not on the nodes being configured by the router. _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
