On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Keith Moore <mo...@network-heretics.com> wrote: > And IMO, it's far beyond a reasonable scope for this, or any, WG that is > limited to a single area. And perhaps a traditional IETF WG isn't the right > structure for tackling this kind of problem.
This seems like a fairly nonsensical statement. The IETF has areas, and working groups. It is frequently the case that work being done in a working group affects more than one area. The IETF has not burst into an explosion of pure energy as a result of the streams being crossed thus far. I suspect we are safe in the future as well. If you have some concrete proposal to make, I think it would be worth hearing it, but if you are just going to take pot shots, there's not much the rest of us can do except to try to continue getting work done while ducking your occasional volley. _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
