On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:44 AM, GangChen <phdg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Backing to the target of this thread, we intent to describe > issues within HE-MIF context. For issues in general and concrete > recommendations, would it make sense to draft new I-D?
No. The point of HE-MIF is to solve the problem. So not talking about the full problem in the HE-MIF solution means that we're producing something that's probably harmful. It sounds like you think there's some value to doing DNS queries within one provisioning domain, and then using the results in the other provisioning domain. Can you explain why? _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
