On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 09:56 -0400, Keith Pierce wrote: > Thanks for starting this, Adam. Being part of the MifOS developer > wiki, I assume that we developers would limit the scope of the notes > to technical aspects of MifOS, such as the first entry on database > pooling. Is that what you had in mind, Adam?
Yes. Taking after Ubuntu's release notes, I changed the wiki page hierarchy a little. The v1.1 release notes can now be found here: http://mifos.org/developers/wiki/ReleaseNotes/V11 Quick brainstorm on level of detail... I'm thinking we should aim for "lightweight" release notes. Ideally the release notes should be as detailed as possible and serve as a historical record of what's in a release. But there's no way we have time/resources to publish release notes like, for instance, Fedora's ( http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/ ), so perhaps we should shoot for something as detailed as Ubuntu's ( http://ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/710 ). I've never read all of Fedora's release notes anyway. If something breaks when I'm using Ubuntu or Fedora, I usually just do a Google search to figure out a fix. So, I figure we're in decent shape for v1.1 if all release-notes-type-content (config changes, known issues, etc.) are *somewhere* public. -- Adam Monsen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Mifos-functional mailing list Mifos-functional@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-functional
