Today's conversation on IRC about mailing list partitioning brought up the issue of this mailing list's name. Van mentioned, "...the original reason for the functional list was to separate out a place to discuss the definition of new mifos functionality that was separate from the technical discussions on the dev list".
I've got an idea, what if we just renamed mifos-functional to mifos-user? "user" seems to address the nature of most questions posted to this list. This might also serve as a solution to the partitioning issues I mentioned here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.finance.mifos.devel/5279 New functionality could be discussed on mifos-developer. Having "current" (maintenance) development discussions alongside "next realease (new feature) development discussions might also help keep overall Mifos architecture consistent. -- Adam Monsen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Mifos-functional mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-functional
