[ 
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=57988#action_57988
 ] 

angshuman sarkar commented on MIFOS-2958:
-----------------------------------------

fixed for validations. Note, the solution is still not same as loans - for 
negating previous entry and doing a new entry. 

> Unable to adjust savings transactions with zero amount transactions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIFOS-2958
>                 URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2958
>             Project: mifos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: Release 1.5.0.1
>            Reporter: Ryan Whitney
>            Assignee: mifosdeveloperqueue
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Shamim D
>
>
> When trying to adjust a savings transaction and set it to zero, Mifos returns 
> an error that the user must enter in amount more than zero.
> REPRO:
> 1. find a savings account with a recent deposit
> 2. Click on "Apply Adjustment"
> 3. Enter in 0 for the amount and a note
> 4. Click submit
> EXPECTED: You can adjust the transaction to be zero
> ACTUAL: Mifos returns an error stating that the transaction needs to be more 
> than zero.
> This is broken as if the user mis-enters in a deposit, they need to reverse 
> it.  
> Note: The way adjustments work on loans and savings is different.  Why don't 
> we just negate the entry for savings just like we do on loans?  Why aren't 
> these standard?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues

Reply via email to