[
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOSBI-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63646#action_63646
]
Adam Balcerzak edited comment on MIFOSBI-165 at 1/15/11 5:15 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have investigated this issue. It appears that all the date ranges are taken
correctly. The difference in number of groups in Client Summary is becouse of
showing both GroupStatus-Active and GroupStatus-OnHold groups in contrast to
showing only GroupStatus-Active groups in Group Formation. In this case there
was one OnHold group valid from 2010-09-04.
Moreover groups in Group Formation are created by current Officer what is not
checked with groups in Client Summary. In this case there is one group formed
by other loan officer within groups in Client Summary.
was (Author: abalcerzak):
I have investigated this issue. It appears that all the date ranges are
taken correctly. The difference in number of groups in Client Summary is
becouse of showing both 'Active' and 'OnHold' groups in contrast to showing
only 'Active' groups in Group Formation. Moreover groups in Group Formation are
created by current Officer what is not checked with groups in Client Summary.
> inconsistent totals for Loan Officer Detailed Report # of groups
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIFOSBI-165
> URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOSBI-165
> Project: mifos business intelligence
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reports
> Affects Versions: Mifos BI 1.0
> Reporter: jbrewster
> Assignee: Adam Balcerzak
> Fix For: Mifos BI 1.0 - Iteration 15, Mifos BI 1.0
>
>
> From Jakub:
> Doubts about Loan Officer Detailed Report. I have created two test cases:
> 1) Office: br2, Loan Officer: br2 LO xxx, Period Start: 2010-07-01, Period
> End: 2010-09-30
> 2) Office: br2, Loan Officer: br2 LO xxx, Period Start: 2010-07-01, Period
> End: 2010-08-15
> and received the following results:
> 1) # of groups added(To Date): 3
> # of groups added(This Period): 3
> ...
> # of groups: 5
> 2) # of groups added(To Date): 3
> # of groups added(This Period): 3
> ...
> # of groups: 4
> Isn't this strange that # of groups is bigger than # of groups added to date?
> Why # of groups is bigger as of 2010-09-30, if # of groups added to date is
> the same in both results?
> From kay: I wonder if the Summary section is doing as of TODAY instead of as
> of the last date in the date range. It should be the latter, so can we add
> an issue for this. Also maybe we should make the heading of the box more
> clear - it should say "Client Summary - As of xx/xx/xxxx" where the date is
> the last date of date range run.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
