|
||||||||||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||||||||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Mifos-issues mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
Keith, don't know if you currently get notifications of Jira changes but the reason I reopened this issue is I'm still wondering what the use-case is for clients being part of more than one group.
You talked a while ago that the loan officer relationship in mifos should have been at the loan level rather than client level for certain situations (like a client being in 2 programs at Nuru).
Does this idea translate here? i.e. is the client only in more than one group because of the loans the client has - is the relation "a group has many loans rather than a group has many clients"?
Not saying is it, just that I think we'd have to look at use-cases to understand.