Yes it does.  All ports how their respective activity

On 11/4/2014 7:28 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Version six changes this for switched ports I do believe.
>
> On Nov 4, 2014 9:26 PM, "Jeff Harms" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     That's a really good question. The Mikrotik defaults will set it
>     up to do user master and slave ports, but still has to bridge
>     between wlan1 and master port so there is still a bridge. That's
>     not the only reason I don't like using that setup. I like to know
>     what's going on at a glance; the master slave port setup show all
>     traffic to the master port. It's like the slave ports are doing
>     nothing, That doesn't help me know where traffic is coming from
>     and going to on those switched ports.
>
>     On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Butch Evans <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         On 11/03/2014 09:14 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
>         > Better way is to use the switch chip on ports 2-5 and bridge
>         the other
>         > stuff to port 2.
>
>         What makes this "better"?
>
>
>         --
>         Butch Evans
>         702-537-0979 <tel:702-537-0979>
>         Network Support and Engineering
>         http://store.wispgear.net/
>         http://www.butchevans.com/
>         _______________________________________________
>         Mikrotik-users mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mikrotik-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to