That adds unless are overhead and is blocked by Many firewalls. 1.1.1.1 is the clients Wan ip. It is not in router a b or c .
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Christian Palecek <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:12/20/2014 10:59 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask </div><div> </div>I think you are going to have to use dst-nat as a 1:1 nat, unless they actually are routing you ip's, then you would just route them like you would any subnet. Christian Palecek Network Administrator Cybernet Inc. Hamilton, MT -------- Original message -------- From: T Maylone <[email protected]> Date:12/20/2014 7:33 AM (GMT-07:00) To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask example routing through two routers assume your public ip is 1.1.1.1 assume your provider routes 1.1.1.1 to your router A ether port 1 assume there is a relationship between router a ether 2 10.254.0.1/29 and router B ether 1 10.254.0.2 assume there is a relationship between router b ether 2 10.253.0.1/29 and router c ether 1 10.253.0.2 In router A IP route 1.1.1.1 10.254.0.2 In router B IP router 1.1.1.1 10.253.0.2 On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Tim Reichhart <[email protected]> wrote: Guys I am just wondering if I have multiple wan IP's on ether1 is an way to place it onto other ethernet interfaces? Also I am running ospf on my routers so lets say router A is the main core with wan IP’s and router B needs an wan IP from router A for an internal IP how would I route that? Tim _______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
