Doesn't matter who "owns" them (actually ARIN does, but that is another
thread.) What matters is how they are routed.
And Chrisian's "are yours" didn't mean you own them; he means you manage
them.
On 12/20/2014 2:50 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
Christian
The ips isn’t owned by me its owned by the upstream provider.
Tim
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christian Palecek
*Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:24 PM
*To:* Mikrotik Users
*Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
Just tracert your /28 out on the internet. Network-tools.com if your
router responds with dst unreachable from the 1.1.1.1 router then the
ips are yours. Then you are responsible for the gateway
Christian Palecek
Network Administrator
Cybernet Inc.
Hamilton, MT
-------- Original message --------
From: Tim Reichhart <[email protected]>
Date:12/20/2014 12:09 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: 'Mikrotik Users' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
@ Scott
Addresses come in pPowers of 2, so you probably have 16 addresses in
the block. So, need to know what subnet mask you use to connect. If
you are using a /29 or /30, the rest can be located anywhere on the
network. Let OSPF do the work. If you are using the /28 to connect,
you will either need to get your provider to change it or get the rest
of the addresses so you can subnet them.
How many addresses do you want at the "remote" site?
Let's say you have a block of 16, a /28. You can have a block of 8, a
/29, at the headend and connected to the provider. Then you can have 8
more somewhere else on the network. As long as you put the address in
OSPF correctly, the 8 addresses from the second half can be anywhere
on your network and OSPF will get them routed
I don’t know if I can even spit up the block like how your saying
because I only have 1 gateway IP address from the upstream provider
unless there is something I don’t know about because one mikrotik
router (core) router is handling the ip’s then from there its ospf
over wireless ptp link to an other mikrotik router with totally
different internal IP address from router a haves.
@ Christian
So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route the
whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just setting
a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a. Or if it is ospf you
could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a 1:1 nat to a
private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just not clear on your
setup.
This is how I got the network currently setup:
modem ----: routerboard a (w/static wan IP’s w/ospf) then the link is
on ether is going for my ptp to other routerboard b (running ospf
also) on ether1 then I want ether 2-4 run to sectors etc.
So I need to figure out how to route the static wan ip’s over ospf
from routerboard a to b etc..
Tim
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christian Palecek
*Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 1:07 PM
*To:* Mikrotik Users
*Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
So if you have a /28 and it was routed to router a, you can route the
whole thing or just subnets to router b, and use them by just setting
a gateway on router b. Or a gateway on router a. Or if it is ospf you
could just assign a single ip to a loopback and do a 1:1 nat to a
private. There is a lot of ways to do this, I'm just not clear on your
setup.
Christian Palecek
Network Administrator
Cybernet Inc.
Hamilton, MT
-------- Original message --------
From: [email protected]
Date:12/20/2014 10:48 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
Scott I got block of 13 and I can go all the way of block of 254 if I
wanted to.
Tim
On 2014-12-20 12:21, Scott Reed wrote:
> How many addresses do they give you?
> What is the subnet mask you use on your connection to the upstream?
>
> On 12/20/2014 12:07 PM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:
>> Well the upstream provider have the static ip's scripted inside the
>> modem. So I don't think they are actually routing the ip's directly to
>> me.
>>
>> So it looks like I'm going have go bat route setup if that is correct.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On 2014-12-20 10:59, Christian Palecek wrote:
>>> I think you are going to have to use dst-nat as a 1:1 nat, unless
>>> they
>>> actually are routing you ip's, then you would just route them like
>>> you
>>> would any subnet.
>>>
>>> Christian Palecek
>>> Network Administrator
>>> Cybernet Inc.
>>> Hamilton, MT
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: T Maylone <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Date:12/20/2014 7:33 AM (GMT-07:00)
>>> To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Couple questions to ask
>>>
>>> example routing through two routers
>>>
>>> assume your public ip is 1.1.1.1
>>> assume your provider routes 1.1.1.1 to your router A ether port 1
>>> assume there is a relationship between router a ether 2 10.254.0.1/29
>>> [2] and router B ether 1 10.254.0.2
>>> assume there is a relationship between router b ether 2 10.253.0.1/29
>>> [3] and router c ether 1 10.253.0.2
>>>
>>> In router A
>>> IP route 1.1.1.1 10.254.0.2
>>>
>>> In router B
>>> IP router 1.1.1.1 10.253.0.2
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Tim Reichhart <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guys
>>>>
>>>> I am just wondering if I have multiple wan IP's on ether1 is an way
>>>> to place it onto other ethernet interfaces? Also I am running ospf
>>>> on my routers so lets say router A is the main core with wan IP’s
>>>> and router B needs an wan IP from router A for an internal IP how
>>>> would I route that?
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users [1]
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>> [2] http://10.254.0.1/29
>>> [3] http://10.253.0.1/29
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>> Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date:
>> 12/20/14
>
> --
> Scott Reed
> Owner
> NewWays Networking, LLC
> Wireless Networking
> Network Design, Installation and Administration
> Mikrotik Advanced Certified
> www.nwwnet.net <http://www.nwwnet.net>
> (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4253/8773 - Release Date: 12/20/14
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
