Thanks for the explanation Alexander.  I have no business being in this
business (i am really a television broadcast engineer) but nobody else will
do it out here.   :)

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Alexander Neilson <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi James
>
> Both packet counts and Mbps counts are important as they both consume
> resources (packets need to each be processed by the router, and a link has
> only a limited number of Mbps data can consume).
>
> Remember that every packet can be as short as 64 Bytes or much much larger
> (usually up to 1518 Bytes but could be even larger)
>
> In theory for every packet being sent there should be an acknowledgement
> (ACK, for TCP and some other protocols) or potentially a reply. For ACK
> packets these are usually minimum length packets and depending on the
> details of what was being communicated then a reply may be minimum sized,
> the same as the original packet, or very much bigger (even fragmented).
> Acknowledgements can also be "selective" in the sense that not every packet
> gets its own ACK to reduce packet count on the wire.
>
> Different types of communication also attract packets of different sizes
> and with different types of responses. For example an RTP stream for a
> phone call using 711A/U codec's will often present approximately 50 Packets
> per second of approx 200 Bytes in length and overall uses approximately
> 80Kbps on the link.
>
> 1500B packets obviously pass a lot of traffic with a small packet count,
> 64B packets need a much larger number of packets to pass the same amount of
> traffic. Your screenshot looks to me (talking about the current flow) that
> you probably have a good speed TCP connection on the line with replies
> using selective acknowledgement explaining some of the reduced packet count
> in one direction.
>
> Apologies if this didn't answer the question you really had, if you expand
> in more detail what you want to know I am sure myself and / or others would
> be able to help out.
>
> Regards
> Alexander
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to