Yeah, it was a firmware update that made it show up in the logs for us too.
In our setup, each OSPF instance is inside its own vlan running a public
/30. We've got one CCR with two ports in a bridge, each port going to a 24
port edge switch. The CCR has multiple OSPF peers and all are throwing the
error. Our router ID's are not 0.0.0.0.


Robbie Wright
Siuslaw Broadband <https://siuslawbroadband.com>
541-902-5101

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Dan Harling via Mikrotik-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Duplicate router ID causes a different message--and no small amount of
> routing table instability.  (Don't ask how I know.)  IIRC, this
> message specifies the same MAC as the interface receiving it.  So it
> seems to be a L2 message not related to IP.  As I said, we never saw
> it prior to a recent ROS update.
>
> An OSPF router ID of 0.0.0.0 will use the "lowest IP address
> configured on an active interface," according to the ROS Wiki.  Which
> makes OSPF precisely as stable as your lowest-IP interface.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Scott Reed via Mikrotik-users
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My experience is that has almost always been a configuration error.
> Often
> > related to Router ID, but not necessarily the one reporting the errors.
> >
> > One thing MT appears to not like is Router ID of 0.0.0.0.
> >
> > Duplicate IP addresses can cause this message.  The packet actually came
> > from somewhere else, but looks like it is local.
> >
> > I am sure there are some other common things, but it has been a while
> since
> > I was dealing with this error message.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/14/2016 7:24 AM, Dan Harling via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> >
> > Some of our routers report this same "locally originated" OSPF message
> > every few minutes.  It's nothing close to "blowing up" the logs, but
> > troubling nonetheless.  And yes, it didn't start happening until we
> > upgraded, probably to 6.36.x.  Just another data point.
> >
> > Daniel Harling  <><
> > Engineering, Cape Ann Communications
> > 183 Main Street, Gloucester, MA  01930
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Robbie Wright via Mikrotik-users
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that's how we have it set. Each router has a unique router ID. Our
> > main router has one ID, but has a dozen or so ospf neighbors. We've been
> > running this setup for quite a while. Doesn't seem like we saw it until
> an
> > upgrade a while back. We do have a loop in our network, on purpose, that
> > OSPF routes around for primary and redundant. However, all of the IP's
> that
> > are showing in the logs aren't part of the ring. They are all legs/stubs
> of
> > the ospf, not anything to do with the ring.
> >
> >
> > Robbie Wright
> > Siuslaw Broadband
> > 541-902-5101
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Each router should have a unique router ID
> >
> > typically, best practice, is to take an IP Address (unique) and assign it
> > to the Loopback interface ( a dummy bridge interface) and use that a
> router
> > id in your OSPF instance..
> >
> > irrespective of how many interfaces you have running OSPF, only one
> unique
> > router id is required.
> >
> >
> > ---------
> > is it possible that you have created a loop where you are seeing the
> > packets from the router it-self ?
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > Faisal Imtiaz
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom
> > 7266 SW 48 Street
> > Miami, FL 33155
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> >
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: "Robbie Wright via Mikrotik-users" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:50:36 PM
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF errors on router
> >
> > I saw this issue pop up again. The duplicate router ID thing caught me.
> > We've got a main tower that has a vlan to a dozen other sites, each
> > running an MT with OSPF. Each vlan has a ptp ospf interface, not
> broadcast,
> > with a unique /30 public IP space. We only run one instance of OSPF on
> our
> > main tower router, with only one router ID.
> >
> > I'm thinking maybe the one router ID across all the vlans is causing the
> > issue? Functionally, everything is working fine. But our logs are
> blowing up
> > with the "Discarding packet: locally originated" error.
> >
> >
> > Robbie Wright
> > Siuslaw Broadband
> > 541-902-5101
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Steve Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Justin I think I have followed all those steps.  I am using 6.29
> > exclusively.  Is there issues with that release?
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Barnes
> >
> > General Manager
> >
> > PCSWIN.COM
> >
> > Howard Power Performance
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson -
> MTIN
> > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:47 PM
> >
> >
> > To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF errors on router
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Some things to make sure of before banging your head.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.Make sure *every* router participating in OSPF is on the same OS
> > version.  They don’t have to be the latest greatest, just the same.  one
> > router in a pool of 50 can taint the database.  Even if it’s one version
> > behind of ahead.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2.Make sure your loopback IP addresses (you are using loopbacks correct?)
> > are listed as the router ID.
> >
> >
> >
> > 3.If these are true point-to-point backhauls change the OSPF type to PTP.
> > This cuts down on the chatter on the link.  Once OSPF establishes a
> session
> > it stops talking as much as if it were in broadcast mode.
> >
> >
> >
> > 4.Double check your IPs and subnet masks.
> >
> >
> >
> > 80some% of the OSPF issues I see are a result of mismatched router OS
> > versions. Bringing everything to the same version solves a ton of issues.
> >
> >
> >
> > Justin Wilson
> >
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
> >
> > xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
> >
> > http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
> >
> > Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sep 17, 2015, at 8:25 AM, Steve Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Not completely.  Not sure we don’t have a small Comm issue to a backhaul.
> > However the outages have gone away just get 2-3 errors a day but it is
> not
> > causing any OSPF issues or outages.  Thinking of just adding a Filter
> rule
> > to block them and go on with life.
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Barnes
> >
> > General Manager
> >
> > PCSWIN.COM
> >
> > Howard Power Performance
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 8:14 AM
> > To: Mikrotik Users <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF errors on router
> >
> >
> >
> > Did you figure this out?
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: "Steve Barnes" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Mikrotik Users ([email protected])"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 11:57:17 AM
> > Subject: [Mikrotik Users] OSPF errors on router
> >
> > I am getting the attached errors in my event log on one tower.  No ports
> > are flapping on the backhaul.  Both Mikrotiks are on 6.29.  Both routers
> CPU
> > is <10%.  As soon as this error passes they will work 100% for hours,
> even
> > days.  I am confused and lost.  PTP conection was Broadcast and have
> changed
> > to point to point.  What to look at?
> >
> >
> >
> > <image001.jpg>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Barnes
> >
> > General Manager
> >
> > PCSWIN.COM
> >
> > Howard Power Performance
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Harling  <><
> Engineering, Cape Ann Communications
> 183 Main Street, Gloucester, MA  01930
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to