For the amount of throughout you specified and the number of firewall rules and other services that you mention the 3011 is a perfect fit. ;) The 3011 has been stable with few caveats. It is a new platform and processor but it seems to be working well.
Carlan On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, 8:05 AM canopy--- via Mikrotik-users < [email protected]> wrote: > Been working great for us. Most of ours are at customer sites with > redundant connections running OSPF > and running just fine passing over 100 Mbps. > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Ethan E. Dee via Mikrotik-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Very reliable. > We've got them at our tower sites. > We've got a dual router setup at a tower with 100+ wireless customers > coming off a hex router with a failover ubiquiti erl as well. hasn't had to > fail over once in over a year. > > > On 12/19/2016 10:44 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote: > > I think that's probably the #1 use case for most Mikrotiks... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Sam Morris via Mikrotik-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Have any of you used one of these? We're looking for routers for > intermediate, smaller tower sites. The layout will basically be: > > PoP1---ST1---ST2---ST3---ST4---ST5---ST6---PoP2 > > ST=small tower > > The idea being that we use something on the ST locations that will run > OSPF so that if a link goes down in the middle for some reason, OSPF > will route packets automatically to the PoP that it's still able to reach. > > So say for instance if this happened: > > PoP1---ST1---ST2---ST3---ST4-x-ST5---ST6---PoP2 > > (x=link down) > > the traffic from ST5 and ST6 will only try to go to PoP2, whereas the > traffic from ST1 through ST4 would go out PoP1. That 3011 router kind of > seems like overkill, but the price isn't bad ($145) and it should handle > any amount of traffic that would get thrown at it through these smaller > tower sites. > > Thanks > Sam > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
