Dennis,
When are you going to update your 2nd edition (Learn RouterOS)with a
3rd? The chapter on Dude was sort of helpful, needs an update.
Jan V
On 05/09/2017 08:05 AM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users wrote:
We make the PowerRouter v3 and v4, depending on your needs.
*/_Dennis Burgess_/**–**Network Solution Engineer – Consultant ***
MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant
<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> –
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>
*From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Kevin
Sullivan via Mikrotik-users
*Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 4:50 PM
*To:* 'Kevin Myers' <kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com>; 'Mikrotik Users'
<mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load
Thanks. Just for clarification, we're only see 100% load on one core,
not on the router as a whole.
It's started crashing OSPF occasionally when we log into the router
via SSH, as well. It doesn't do that with winbox, only SSH. Kinda
weird, since I would think the OSPF stuff would be running through an
alternate core, as would the SSH login.
Right now we're thinking we're going to have to switch to x86 for more
processing power per CPU. Don't see that many options for a pre-built
x86, though.
Kevin
*From:*Kevin Myers [mailto:kevin.my...@iparchitechs.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 02, 2017 5:11 PM
*To:* Kevin Sullivan; Mikrotik Users
*Subject:* RE: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load
If you’re advertising a large number of routes to your 31 peers (full
or partial tables) then you’ll need to adjust your routing
architecture somewhat and consider using the CCR1072 more for transit
and offload some of the peerings with a larger number of routes onto a
CHR or x86 VM with a public route reflector (depends on throughput
requirements).
You can easily get over 100 peerings on a CCR but the route count has
to be lower.
*Thanks,*
**
*Kevin Myers*
*MTCINE # 1409
MTCRE, MTCTCE, MTCWE, CCNP, MCP *
/Network Architect / Managing Partner/
+1 (601) 287-3868 - Mobile (GMT -6)
+1 (303) 590-9943 – Office (GMT -6)
ipa.kevin.myers – Skype
iparchitechs_ms_logo_msp-header-166x46
**
*#1 Ranked MikroTik consulting firm in North America*
*Expert consulting in | BGP | MPLS | OSPF | ISP | Data Center*
**
*IPA 2017 Conference Schedule – Come meet up with us !!*
**
MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) EUROPE – Milan, Italy – March 30th-31st, 2017
WISPAMERICA (WISPA) USA – Memphis, TN – March 14th-16th, 2017
MikroTik User Meeting (MUM) USA – TBA – SPRING 2017
*From:* mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Kevin
Sullivan via Mikrotik-users
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:44 PM
*To:* mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
*Subject:* [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load
All,
We have an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports
and a 10g connection back to the rest of the network. We're only
passing ~1g at peak times currently, but the resources display shows
100% CPU on one of the cores continuously. If we look at the load
profiler, it says that "routing" is consuming 100% of that core.
We have 31 BGP peers and 25 route filters on the router. I'm wondering
what we can do to lessen or spread the load around a bit.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
